On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:11:54 +0100
Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, on the PIIX it is and I guess on anything where it's _not_
fully internal an 0xf0 write wouldn't have any effect on IRQ13...
When you earlier mentioned this it seemed 0xed switched on DMI would
be good enough, but well.
Alan, do you have an opinion on the port 0xf0 write? It should
probably still be combined with a replacement/deletion for new
machines due to the bus-locking "bad for real-time" thing you
mentioned earlier but in the short run it could be a fairly
low-impact replacement on anything except a 386+387
Both 0xed and 0xf0 are mapped to internal functions on the AMD Elan
SC400 processor. It is an AMD 486 based system on a chip and since AMD
just knew that it would never have a math coprocessor, they reused the
0xf0-0xf2 range for the PCMCIA controller. I guess the AMD Elan SC500
will have similar problems.
I seem to recall that back when I was working with the Elan SC400
(sometime around 1998?) there were discussions about finding an
alternate delay port because outb to 0x80 messed up the debug port. I
think the Elan stopped those discussions because just about every port
on the Elan was reused for some alternate purpose.