Re: [PATCH] [20/20] x86: Print which shared library/executable faulted in segfault etc. messages

[Andi Kleen]

> > And printing the offset into a mapping also always allows to find the 
> > correct fault point in a library even with randomized mappings. Previously
> > there was no way to actually find the correct code address inside
> > the randomized mapping.
> > 
> > Relies on earlier patch to shorten the printk formats.
> > 
> > They are often now longer than 80 characters, but I think that's worth 
> > it.
> 
> why not make it multi-line? that way the %lx hack wouldnt be needed 
> either.

I prefer it single-line. I also disagree on %lx being a hack.

> 
> > +void print_vma_addr(char *prefix, unsigned long ip)
> > +{
> > +	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> > +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > +	down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > +	vma = find_vma(mm, ip);
> 
> grumble. Proper CodingStyle please.


Looks fine to me. If you mean the new line after variables -- that was always optional.

Anyways I'll repost with the error check.

Also it seems like you did apply only parts of the patchkit. If you do that can
you send a list of what patches you didn't add, otherwise it'll be messy to figure
this out from here.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/