Re: [patch 1/3] move WARN_ON() out of line

[Arjan van de Ven]

Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:56:58AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > Subject: move WARN_ON() out of line
> > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> > CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > A quick grep shows that there are currently 1145 instances of WARN_ON
> > in the kernel. Currently, WARN_ON is pretty much entirely inlined,
> > which makes it hard to enhance it without growing the size of the kernel
> > (and getting Andrew unhappy).
> >
> > This patch moves WARN_ON() out of line entirely. I've considered keeping
> > the test inline and moving only the slowpath out of line, but I decided
> > against that: an out of line test reduces the pressure on the CPUs
> > branch predictor logic and gives smaller code, while a function call
> > to a fixed location is quite fast. Likewise I've considered doing something
> > similar to BUG() (eg use a trapping instruction) but that's not really
> > better (it needs the test inline again and recovering from an invalid
> > instruction isn't quite fun).
>
> Hi Arjan,
>
> I've got a couple of patches in -mm at the moment that introduces __WARN()
> and uses that (and lets architectures override __WARN, since for example
> powerpc does use trapping instructions similarly to BUG()).
>
> The two patches in question are:
>
> bugh-remove-have_arch_bug--have_arch_warn.patch
> powerpc-switch-to-generic-warn_on-bug_on.patch
>
> Care to do this incrementally on top of that instead? I.e. call
> do_warn_on() from the asm-generic/bug.h __WARN() instead.
ok just did that; will post shortly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/