Re: [patch?] s2ram + P4 + tsc = annoyance

[Pavel Machek]

On Sun 2007-12-30 15:08:15, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > ok, i prefer this fix a bit more. (we dont want to set last_tsc 
> > outside of the sync_lock - which your initial patch does)
> 
> i've added your patch to x86.git - thanks Mike! (patch below) I think 
> this would be too dangerous for v2.6.24 though - we can put it back into 
> -stable for 2.6.24.1, once it had more testing?

If it is too dangerous for -final, I guess it is bad idea to push it
into -stable.

Plus it does not fix really bad bug.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/