Re: [PATCH x86] [5/16] Replace hard coded reservations in x86-64early boot code with dynamic table II

[Joe Perches]

On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 19:06 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> But the problem with your "rule" is that every of the hundreds
> of Linux kernel contributors will need to do the same. And that's just 
> ineffecient, waste of valuable human work and just doesn't make much sense.
> 
> It certainly won't improve Linux in any way.

What I would prefer is a git option that supports
check-in/outs in a coding style of a user choice.

Commits should be white space ignorant.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/