Re: [patch?] s2ram + P4 + tsc = annoyance

[Ingo Molnar]

* Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun 2007-12-30 15:08:15, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > > ok, i prefer this fix a bit more. (we dont want to set last_tsc 
> > > outside of the sync_lock - which your initial patch does)
> > 
> > i've added your patch to x86.git - thanks Mike! (patch below) I 
> > think this would be too dangerous for v2.6.24 though - we can put it 
> > back into -stable for 2.6.24.1, once it had more testing?
> 
> If it is too dangerous for -final, I guess it is bad idea to push it 
> into -stable.

we regularly delay bugs to the .1 release, if a fix is a bit complex and 
just needs a bit of time to be fully trusted for a stable release.

> Plus it does not fix really bad bug.

yeah, granted.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/