Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.

[Rene Herman]

On 08-01-08 00:24, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Rene Herman wrote:
> > Is this only about the ones then left for things like legacy PIC and 
> > PIT? Does anyone care about just sticking in a udelay(2) (or 1) there 
> > as a replacement and call it a day?
>
> PIT is problematic because the PIT may be necessary for udelay setup.

Yes, can initialise loops_per_jiffy conservatively. Just didn't quite get 
why you guys are talking about an ISA bus speed parameter.

Rene.


Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/