Re: free_pages_check

[Nick Piggin]

On Tuesday 08 January 2008 13:43, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> wonder why free_pages_check mm/page_alloc.c is using bit OR than logical OR
>
> @@ -450,9 +450,9 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struc
>
>  static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
>  {
> -       if (unlikely(page_mapcount(page) |
> -               (page->mapping != NULL)  |
> -               (page_count(page) != 0)  |
> +       if (unlikely(page_mapcount(page) ||
> +               (page->mapping != NULL)  ||
> +               (page_count(page) != 0)  ||
>                 (page->flags & (
>                         1 << PG_lru     |
>                         1 << PG_private |

Because the positive case is extremely rare, so there is no benefit (nor
any correctness requirement) for short-circuit evaluation, and we don't
want to have all the branches that it involves. I think it is 3 more
conditional jumps.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/