Re: [PATCHv2] kprobes: Introduce is_kprobe_fault()

[Paul Mackerras]

Harvey Harrison writes:

> Use a central is_kprobe_fault() inline in kprobes.h to remove all
> of the arch-dependant, practically identical implementations in
> avr32, ia64, powerpc, s390, sparc64, and x86.

I don't like the name "is_kprobe_fault" since the function actually
handles the fault - i.e. it does more than just tell the caller
whether this is a kprobes fault.  Something like
"handle_kprobes_fault" or "maybe_handle_kprobes_fault" would be
better IMO.

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/