Re: [PATCH 00/10] percpu: Per cpu code simplification V3

[Mike Travis]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>>> i had the patch below for v2, it's still needed (because i didnt 
>>> apply the s390/etc. bits), right?
>> Well the patch really should go through mm because it is a change that 
>> covers multiple arches. I think testing with this is fine. I think 
>> Mike has diffed this against Linus tree so this works but will now 
>> conflict with the modcopy patch already in mm.
> 
> well we cannot really ack it for x86 inclusion without having tested it 
> through, so it will stay in x86.git for some time. That approach found a 
> few problems with v1 already. In any case, v3 is looking pretty good so 
> far - and it's cool stuff - i'm all for unifying/generalizing arch code.
> 
> 	Ingo

Hi Ingo,

You probably will want to pick up V4 though I didn't add that ifndef
patch you mentioned earlier.  There are no functional changes, basically
only a rebasing on the correct mm version.

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/