Re: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl

[Kevin Winchester]

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> I imagined it would check for 
>>
>> +struct file_operations ... = { 
>> +      ...
>> +       .ioctl = ...
>>
>> That wouldn't catch the case of someone adding only .ioctl to an 
>> already existing file_operations which is not visible in the patch context, 
>> but that should be hopefully rare. The more common case is adding
>> completely new operations
> 
> Right, this would work fine. We can probably even have a list of
> data structures that work like file_operations in this regard.
> 

file_operations & block_device_operations are the only two that I can find.

-- 
Kevin Winchester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/