Re: Analysis of sched_mc_power_savings

[Ingo Molnar]

* Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I will watch this during the experiments.  I have been using klog 
> application to dump relayfs data.  I did run powertop and top as well, 
> I will bind them to certain CPUs and isolate their impact.
> 
> I believe the margin of error would be less since all the measurement 
> tasks sleep for long duration.

ok, long duration ought to be enough.

i think a possible explanation of your observtions would be this: sleepy 
workloads are affected more by the wakeup logic, and most of the 
power-savings works via runtime balancing.

So perhaps try to add some SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE logic to 
try_to_wake_up()? I think waking up on the same CPU where it went to 
sleep is the most power-efficient approach in general. (or always waking 
up where the wakee runs - this should be measured.) Right now 
try_to_wake_up() tries to spread out load opportunistically, which is 
throughput-maximizing but it's arguably not very power conscious.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/