Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86: optimize page faults like all otherachitectures and kill notifier cruft"

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 07:18:46AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:17:37 +0000 (GMT)
> > Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > So all distros with 2.6.24 kernels are useless to mmiotrace I don't
> > > see why leaving things as is until a suitable replacement mechanism
> > > can be used.. 
> > 
> > you work for a distro.. surely you can convince your own distro to 
> > carry this patch for one release? Maybe if it's this important.. so 
> > can the others...
> 
> But if it's good for a major distribution why is it not good for 
> mainline?

it's a bit too late to get the out-of-tree module into v2.6.24, and the 
revert makes little sense without the extra out-of-tree module. We at a 
minimum need a clear explanation of why this functionality cannot be 
provided via kprobes/systemtap.

> We had this discussion at last kernel summit and the answer was clear.

it's a clear answer 1 week after the merge window opens, but not 1 week 
before the next stable kernel is released.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/