Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86: optimize page faults like all other achitectures and kill notifier cruft"

[Andi Kleen]

> Probing vmalloc faults is _really_ tricky : it also implies that the
> handler (let's call it probe) connected to the probe point (marker or
> kprobe) should _never_ cause a vmalloc page fault, 

That is why vmalloc_sync_all() was invented. It might make sense
to just call that on kprobe registration.

But I agree the other problems makes it a bad idea.

I think the better solution is to keep the notifier, but make 
it cheaper (e.g. by using constant patching ...)

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/