Re: Replacement for page fault notifiers?

[Matt Mackall]

On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 21:21 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 20:03 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> 
> > That makes it way too easy for drivers of questionable legality to just
> > clear that bit. Also, we've got a shortage of page bits, etc.
> 
> If we ever have this problem, the bit can be changed in the kernel to
> fool those drivers (I hope the shortage is not so dire that there will
> be no more bits left).

That's what we call an arms race. And yes, page bits are close to
running out on 32-bit.

> I don't think evil drivers should be a problem per se.  There are
> existing non-free drivers that still need to be traced over and over
> again.  I guess ndiswrapper could use tracing for Windows drivers that
> don't know anything about Linux page flags.
> 
> Last but not least, mmiotrace should be useful for free drivers in the
> first place to have a legitimate reason to be in the kernel.

I definitely agree that tracing MMIO is an extremely useful feature.
I've implemented it myself once already for 2.4.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/