Re: [patch 5/9] unprivileged mounts: allow unprivileged bind mounts

[Serge E. Hallyn]

Quoting Miklos Szeredi (miklos@xxxxxxxxxx):
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Allow bind mounts to unprivileged users if the following conditions are met:
> 
>   - mountpoint is not a symlink
>   - parent mount is owned by the user
>   - the number of user mounts is below the maximum
> 
> Unprivileged mounts imply MS_SETUSER, and will also have the "nosuid" and
> "nodev" mount flags set.
> 
> In particular, if mounting process doesn't have CAP_SETUID capability,
> then the "nosuid" flag will be added, and if it doesn't have CAP_MKNOD
> capability, then the "nodev" flag will be added.

That little part by itself is really needed in order to make the ability
to remove CAP_MKNOD from a process tree's bounding set meaningful.
Else instead of creating /dev/hda1, the user can just mount a filesystem
with hda1 existing on it.  (Which is why I was surprised when one day
I found this code missing :)

But of course I'm a fan of the patchset altogether.  I plan to review in
more detail early next week, but since I liked the previous submission I
don't see myself having any complaints, so I'm glad to see the reviews
by others.

thanks,
-serge

> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Index: linux/fs/namespace.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/namespace.c	2008-01-04 13:47:49.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/fs/namespace.c	2008-01-04 13:48:01.000000000 +0100
> @@ -487,11 +487,34 @@ static void dec_nr_user_mounts(void)
>  	spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
>  }
> 
> -static void set_mnt_user(struct vfsmount *mnt)
> +static int reserve_user_mount(void)
> +{
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
> +	if (nr_user_mounts >= max_user_mounts && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> +		err = -EPERM;
> +	else
> +		nr_user_mounts++;
> +	spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void __set_mnt_user(struct vfsmount *mnt)
>  {
>  	BUG_ON(mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_USER);
>  	mnt->mnt_uid = current->fsuid;
>  	mnt->mnt_flags |= MNT_USER;
> +
> +	if (!capable(CAP_SETUID))
> +		mnt->mnt_flags |= MNT_NOSUID;
> +	if (!capable(CAP_MKNOD))
> +		mnt->mnt_flags |= MNT_NODEV;
> +}
> +
> +static void set_mnt_user(struct vfsmount *mnt)
> +{
> +	__set_mnt_user(mnt);
>  	spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
>  	nr_user_mounts++;
>  	spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
> @@ -510,10 +533,16 @@ static struct vfsmount *clone_mnt(struct
>  					int flag)
>  {
>  	struct super_block *sb = old->mnt_sb;
> -	struct vfsmount *mnt = alloc_vfsmnt(old->mnt_devname);
> +	struct vfsmount *mnt;
> 
> +	if (flag & CL_SETUSER) {
> +		int err = reserve_user_mount();
> +		if (err)
> +			return ERR_PTR(err);
> +	}
> +	mnt = alloc_vfsmnt(old->mnt_devname);
>  	if (!mnt)
> -		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +		goto alloc_failed;
> 
>  	mnt->mnt_flags = old->mnt_flags;
>  	atomic_inc(&sb->s_active);
> @@ -525,7 +554,7 @@ static struct vfsmount *clone_mnt(struct
>  	/* don't copy the MNT_USER flag */
>  	mnt->mnt_flags &= ~MNT_USER;
>  	if (flag & CL_SETUSER)
> -		set_mnt_user(mnt);
> +		__set_mnt_user(mnt);
> 
>  	if (flag & CL_SLAVE) {
>  		list_add(&mnt->mnt_slave, &old->mnt_slave_list);
> @@ -550,6 +579,11 @@ static struct vfsmount *clone_mnt(struct
>  		spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
>  	}
>  	return mnt;
> +
> + alloc_failed:
> +	if (flag & CL_SETUSER)
> +		dec_nr_user_mounts();
> +	return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  }
> 
>  static inline void __mntput(struct vfsmount *mnt)
> @@ -986,22 +1020,26 @@ asmlinkage long sys_oldumount(char __use
> 
>  #endif
> 
> -static int mount_is_safe(struct nameidata *nd)
> +/*
> + * Conditions for unprivileged mounts are:
> + * - mountpoint is not a symlink
> + * - mountpoint is in a mount owned by the user
> + */
> +static bool permit_mount(struct nameidata *nd, int *flags)
>  {
> +	struct inode *inode = nd->path.dentry->d_inode;
> +
>  	if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> -		return 0;
> -	return -EPERM;
> -#ifdef notyet
> -	if (S_ISLNK(nd->path.dentry->d_inode->i_mode))
> -		return -EPERM;
> -	if (nd->path.dentry->d_inode->i_mode & S_ISVTX) {
> -		if (current->uid != nd->path.dentry->d_inode->i_uid)
> -			return -EPERM;
> -	}
> -	if (vfs_permission(nd, MAY_WRITE))
> -		return -EPERM;
> -	return 0;
> -#endif
> +		return true;
> +
> +	if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (!is_mount_owner(nd->path.mnt, current->fsuid))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	*flags |= MS_SETUSER;
> +	return true;
>  }
> 
>  static int lives_below_in_same_fs(struct dentry *d, struct dentry *dentry)
> @@ -1245,9 +1283,10 @@ static int do_loopback(struct nameidata 
>  	int clone_fl;
>  	struct nameidata old_nd;
>  	struct vfsmount *mnt = NULL;
> -	int err = mount_is_safe(nd);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (!permit_mount(nd, &flags))
> +		return -EPERM;
>  	if (!old_name || !*old_name)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	err = path_lookup(old_name, LOOKUP_FOLLOW, &old_nd);
> 
> --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/