Re: [PATCH 10/10] x86: Unify percpu.h

[Ingo Molnar]

* Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
> > Then I really think this particular patch belongs in that other 
> > patch set.  Here, it makes very little sense, and it's on the end 
> > anyway.
> 
> It makes sense in that both percpu_32/64 are very small as a result of 
> earlier patches and so its justifiable to put them together to 
> simplify the next patchset.

i'd agree with this - lets just keep the existing flow of patches 
intact. It's not like the percpu code is in any danger of becoming 
unclean or quirky - it's one of the best-maintained pieces of kernel 
code :)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/