Re: [patch 1/1] Switch ioctl functions of drivers/scsi/sg.c to unlocked_ioctl

[Andre Noll]

On 20:29, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > Sure, I can do that if James likes the idea. Since not all case
> > statements need the BKL, we could add it only to those for which it
> > isn't clear that it is unnecessary.
> > 
> > And this would actually improve something.
> 
> I still think it would be a good strategy to first add it to all
> (in a essentially nop semantics patch) and then later eliminate
> it from the cases that obviously don't need it. 

James, would you accept such a patch?

Andre
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature