Re: [x86] list of style offenders

[Paolo Ciarrocchi]

On Jan 11, 2008 12:30 AM, Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jan 11, 2008 12:08 AM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 23:35 +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> > > On Jan 10, 2008 9:03 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I was playing with checkpatch.pl ;) .. I made a list of style offenders
> > > > inside the arch/x86/ sub-directory. I thought it might be helpful to
> > > > prioritize any style clean ups that people might want to do for x86 ..
> > > > OTOH some of these might show imperfections in checkpatch.pl .. Either
> > > > way I thought it was interesting to review ..
> > > >
> > > > These are sorted by errors, then warnings.. I only included the first
> > > > hundred files which includes about the top %30 of the list .. The
> > > > kprobes_64.c error rate is a little miss-leading because several errors
> > > > are found on a single line ..
> > >
> > > I just pulled
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86 mm
> > >
> > > > ./arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_trig.c
> > > >                 total: 649 errors, 11 warnings, 1845 lines checked
> > >
> > > On that tree checkpatch reports:
> > > total: 5 errors, 54 warnings, 1643 lines checked
> > >
> > > > ./arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c
> > > >                 total: 528 errors, 9 warnings, 749 lines checked
> > >
> > > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 lines checked
> >
> > I pulled the tree your working with , and it's got mostly the same
> > issues .. Are you sure your running the commands properly?
> >
> > The "lines checked" values that you listed looks wrong .. A few you
> > listed as "0 lines checked" , or "1 lines checked" .. Which can't be
> > right..
> >
> > The git logs also show that arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_trig.c hasn't been
> > modified since it was pull in on Oct. 11 ..
>
> Top commit in my tree is:
> commit 62ba5681e2e2d70794719794eadb441875e6d3b3
> Author: From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Wed Jan 9 13:31:14 2008 +0100
>
>
> paolo@paolo-desktop:~/linux-2.6$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --file
> ./arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c
> total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 lines checked
>
> And...paolo@paolo-desktop:~/linux-2.6$ ls -l ./arch/x86/kernel/k*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo  2853 2007-11-08 23:00 ./arch/x86/kernel/k8.c
> -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo  1207 2008-01-10 23:27 ./arch/x86/kernel/kdebugfs.c
> -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo  9828 2008-01-10 23:27 ./arch/x86/kernel/kgdb_32.c
> -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo 11936 2008-01-10 23:27 ./arch/x86/kernel/kgdb_64.c
> -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo  2223 2008-01-10 23:27 ./arch/x86/kernel/kgdb-jmp_32.S
> -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo  1783 2008-01-10 23:27 ./arch/x86/kernel/kgdb-jmp_64.S
> -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo     1 2008-01-10 23:27
> ./arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c <-- What?
> -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo 32078 2008-01-10 23:27 ./arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
>
> I've pulled the tree as follow:
> git branch x86
> git checkout x86
> git-pull --force
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git mm
>
> I tried to pull again and I've got:
> paolo@paolo-desktop:~/linux-2.6$ git-pull --force
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git mm
> Already up-to-date.
>
> gitweb seems to confirm what I'm seeing:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git;a=shortlog;h=mm
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git;a=blob_plain;f=arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c;hb=mm
> which is an empty file

That's the result of the kprobe unification:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git;a=commitdiff;h=17735e04f7f18bea4dcbe4daa31c34acac55b332

Ciao,
-- 
Paolo
http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/