Re: [patch] block: fix blktrace timestamps
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Mon Jan 14 2008 - 03:39:37 EST
Folks, this is getting a little silly.
Even if CONFIG_NO_HZ is new this is a an important regression, and
yes we should avoid regressions wherever we can, and for such a quite
important feature we should fix it. On the other hand blktrace is using
the wrong interface, and it has been told multiple times on lkml that
sched_clock() should never ever be used outside the scheduler. So the
burden to fix this regression lies on the shoulders of the blktrace
maintainer.
No need for silly name calling here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/