Re: The ext3 way of journalling

[Tuomo Valkonen]

On 2008-01-14, Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, that is a usual bug/problem in common distributions[0] as there is
> no real guarantee that your clock is not far off.

It isn't, right after boot. But while the system is on, it sometimes
starts advancing very fast, 15min a day or so. To my knowledge, the
time the CMOS clock is not used then, but rather the kernel tracks the
time based on scheduler interrupts, with ntpd occasionally correcting.
However, ntpd refuses to correct when the time has drifted too much, 
causing even further drift.


> That the reason to activate `ntpdate` unconditionally: It sets the
> current time to an (somewhat) accurate value and `ntpd` handles the
> rest.

Nope, as explained above. ntpdate at boot wouldn't help much, because
the time is (approximately) correct after boot. It only drifts after it.

-- 
Tuomo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/