Re: [RFC, PATCH] watchdog on gpio

[Mike Frysinger]

On Jan 14, 2008 7:14 AM, Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > there is no hard requirement anywhere that says platform resources
> > must be in the board resources file.  marking the functions as __init
> > instead of __devinit will basically cause a kernel crash if someone
> > tries to use dynamic platform resources.  there is no option that i'm
> > aware of that prevents dynamic platform resources which means there is
> > no way for the driver to say "i wont work with standard dynamic
> > platform resources".
>
> There is: platform_driver_probe(). It takes the probe function as a
> parameter so that it can be left out of the platform_driver struct.
> After it returns, there are no references to the probe function left
> around, so if you call platform_driver_probe() instead of
> platform_driver_register(), the probe function can be __init.

ah, thanks for that.  i think in that case, there's no way to bind the
release function to the process ?  which means the driver is no longer
unloadable ?  which means the platform driver release function can be
scrubbed as well as the module exit function as well as changing the
Kconfig to be a bool ?
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/