doesn't nfs_access_cache_shrinker() race with umount?

From: yawei niu
Date: Tue Jan 15 2008 - 04:12:18 EST


Hi, NFS/VFS gurus

nfs_access_cache_shrinker() calls igrab() without serialized with
umount process, looks that might cause the "busy inode" after umount,
doesn't it?

I think we need to serialize the generic_shutdown_super() and
nfs_access_cache_shrinker() just like the dcache/icache shrinker, am I
understanding right?

Thanks
- Niu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/