Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt2
From: Luotao Fu
Date: Tue Jan 15 2008 - 11:27:44 EST
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:41:20PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 tree, which can be
> downloaded from the location:
>
> http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/
>
..........
> Changes since 2.6.24-rc7-rt1
>
..........
> - PPC compile fix (reported by: Robert Schwebel)
>
Compiling with tracing function turned seemed still to be broken to me:
kernel/built-in.o: In function `early_printk_name':
latency_trace.c:(.text+0x3cd18): undefined reference to `early_printk'
latency_trace.c:(.text+0x3cd40): undefined reference to `early_printk'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `early_print_entry':
latency_trace.c:(.text+0x3cd80): undefined reference to `early_printk'
latency_trace.c:(.text+0x3cdd8): undefined reference to `early_printk'
latency_trace.c:(.text+0x3cdfc): undefined reference to `early_printk'
We made a early_printk patch based on the 8250_early for powerpc 32bit here.
(still absolutely untested and incomplete, we will post it asap). I added
early_printk() and exported _mcount() and could compile succesfully. However the
kernel will not boot. I attached a bdi to it and found out that it stucks at
_mcount in arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S at about line 1080, where the variable
mcount_enabled is loaded and checked. Obviously the variable is still not valid
at the time of check. To check this I took out the lines like above
--- arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S.orig 2008-01-15 17:01:25.000000000 +0100
+++ arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S 2008-01-15 17:17:18.000000000 +0100
@@ -1075,9 +1075,6 @@
stw r6, 24(r1)
mflr r3 /* will use as first arg to __trace() */
mfcr r4
- lis r5,mcount_enabled@ha
- lwz r5,mcount_enabled@l(r5)
- cmpwi r5,0
stw r3, 44(r1) /* lr */
stw r4, 8(r1) /* cr */
stw r7, 28(r1)
After recompiling the kernel started normally and it seems to work. I was even
able to make a trace with cyclictest. However there were several crashes (which
might be caused by other problems). I still have to take a closer look.
I am just wondering why the check for mcount_enabled is there at all and I think
that there due to be some better fixes than just throw it out ;-). On the other
side, I just can't find in which way mcount_enabled is used in the tracer at
all. Could you give me some hints on this one?
cheers
Luotao Fu
--
Dipl.-Ing. Luotao Fu | Phone: +49-5121-206917-3
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Entwicklungszentrum Nord http://www.pengutronix.de
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature