Folding _PAGE_PWT into _PAGE_PCD (was Re: unify pagetable accessorspatch causes double fault II)
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Tue Jan 15 2008 - 12:17:20 EST
Ingo Molnar wrote:
-#define _PAGE_PRESENT (_AC(1, UL)<<_PAGE_BIT_PRESENT)
-#define _PAGE_RW (_AC(1, UL)<<_PAGE_BIT_RW)
-#define _PAGE_USER (_AC(1, UL)<<_PAGE_BIT_USER)
-#define _PAGE_PWT (_AC(1, UL)<<_PAGE_BIT_PWT)
-#define _PAGE_PCD ((_AC(1, UL)<<_PAGE_BIT_PCD) | _PAGE_PWT)
BTW, I just noticed that _PAGE_PWT has been folded into _PAGE_PCD. This
seems like a really bad idea to me, since it breaks the rule that
_PAGE_X == 1 << _PAGE_BIT_X. I can't think of a specific place where
this would cause problems, but this kind of non-uniformity always ends
up biting someone in the arse.
I think having a specific _PAGE_NOCACHE which combines these bits is a
better approach.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/