Re: [PATCH 1/3] Improve type handling in interrupt handlers
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Fri Jan 18 2008 - 17:13:19 EST
On Saturday 19 January 2008 07:41:41 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> You should be using irq_handler_t for all these.
Well, these are your drivers, but for mine I dislike the obfuscation.
It's not like you can declare the function itself to be an irq_handler_t, so
it's a strange turd to drop in a driver.
> (Coincedentally, doing so makes it easier for me to later on remove the
> almost-never-used 'irq' argument from all irq handlers)
Slightly, but the compiler would tell you if you miss one, so I don't think
this is real.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/