Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation

[Matthew Garrett]

On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 04:33:29PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:

> I have no obvious objection on either of these two proposals.
> But one thing to mention is that
> both of these two patches is written on the assumption that the
> brightness levels listed in _BCL method are in ascending order, while
> this is not stated in the ACPI spec.
> Is this a problem?

The driver already makes that assumption, and it's implicit in the spec.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/