Re: [PATCH -mm] define empty unxlate_dev_mem_ptr on AVR32
From: Haavard Skinnemoen
Date: Thu Jan 24 2008 - 05:29:45 EST
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:53:54 +1100
Ben Nizette <bn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> /*
> + * We just keep an empty definition of this around (a-la the asm-generic
> + * implementation) to keep /dev/mem happy
> + */
> +#define unxlate_dev_mem_ptr(p, a) {}
Thanks, but this should be either
#define unxlate_dev_mem_ptr(p, a) do { } while (0)
or
static inline void unxlate_dev_mem_ptr(unsigned long phys, void *addr)
{
}
I prefer the latter.
Btw, the breakage was introduced by git-x86.patch. Should I take the
fix through my avr32 tree?
Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/