Re: [patch 25/26] mount options: fix udf

[Miklos Szeredi]

> | +	/* is this correct? */
> | +	if (sbi->s_anchor[2] != 0)
> | +		seq_printf(seq, ",anchor=%u", sbi->s_anchor[2]);
> 
> you know, I would prefer to use form UDF_SB_ANCHOR(sb)[2]
> in sake of style unification but we should wait for Jan's
> decision (i'm not the expert in this area ;)

I think UDF_SB_ANCHOR macro was removed by some patch in -mm.

I'm more interested if the second element of the s_anchor array really
does always have the value of the 'anchor=N' mount option.  I haven't
been able to verify that fully.  Do you have some insight into that?

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/