Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 3/8] SVM: add module parameter to disableNestedPaging

[Avi Kivity]

Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Generally I see no problem with it. But at least for NPT I don't see a
> reason why someone should want to disable it on a VM basis (as far as it
> works stable). Avi, what do you think?
>   

Unless there is a real-life workload that benefits from npt=0, I see no 
reason to have per-vm npt control.  The module parameter is helpful, for 
to isolate npt problems and for development, but I don't see a need for 
users to fiddle with it.

--
Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/