Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] xtime_lock vs update_process_times

[Russell King]

On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:20:30PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:39:55AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > move update_process_times() out from under xtime_lock.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Peter,
> 
> Mind if I merge:
> 
> >  arch/arm/common/time-acorn.c          |    2 --
> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c |    3 ---
> >  arch/arm/plat-iop/time.c              |    4 ----
> >  arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/time.c          |    2 --
> 
> with my patch and submit it as part of the ARM merge (which I'm hoping
> to send in about an hours time.)

Don't bother - I'm sending my patch _now_ - I've run out of time to 
merge the above into this ARM tree pull (since I want to get Linus to
pull it before yet more breakage happens to it - I've had to drop a
number of branches with new conflicts as of last night to even get this
far...)

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/