Re: [PATCH update] firewire: fix "kobject_add failed for fw* with-EEXIST"
From: Stefan Richter
Date: Mon Jan 28 2008 - 18:32:45 EST
I wrote:
> But the interaction with userspace processes opening /dev/fwX while the
> respective node is being shut down gave me headaches. I am still not
> entirely sure if I got it right in the patch update, i.e. if it is free
> from deadlocks. fw_device_shutdown() and fw_device_op_open() can be
> entered at the same time. Would device_unregister() have to acquire a
> driver core lock which open() already took? If yes, device_unregister()
> would be blocked on this lock while fw_device_op_open() is blocked on
> idr_rwsem.
>
> So why did I move device_unregister() into the idr_rwsem protected
> section in the first place? That's because I wanted to guarantee that
> fw_device_op_open() wouldn't look up a fw_device which is just in the
> process of being unregistered. But maybe we don't even need this guarantee.
Did some further thinking: Yes, I have to guarantee that the pointer
which the lookup in the idr tree returned is valid.
But I don't have to shove device_unregister() into the idr_rwsem locked
section. Instead, I can (and actually should) increment the device's
refcount when I stick the device pointer into the idr tree. (And of
course I decrease the refcount again when I remove the pointer from the
idr tree.)
Will probably post another update tomorrow.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- ---= ===-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/