Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] x86: Catch stray non-kprobe breakpoints
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
Date: Tue Jan 29 2008 - 01:01:47 EST
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:38:56PM +0530, Abhishek Sagar wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Non kprobe breakpoints in the kernel might lie inside the .kprobes.text section. Such breakpoints can easily be identified by in_kprobes_functions and can be caught early. These are problematic and a warning should be emitted to discourage them (in any rare case, if they actually occur).
Why? As Masami indicated in an earlier reply, the annotation is to
prevent *only* kprobes.
> For this, a check can route the trap handling of such breakpoints away from kprobe_handler (which ends up calling even more functions marked as __kprobes) from inside kprobe_exceptions_notify.
Well.. we pass on control of a !kprobe breakpoint to the kernel. This is
exactly what permits debuggers like xmon to work fine now. I don't see
any harm in such breakpoints being handled autonomously without any sort
of kprobe influence.
Ananth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/