Re: [PATCH 0/3] percpu: Optimize percpu accesses

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Mike Travis wrote:

> Since the zero-based patch is changing the offset from one based on
> __per_cpu_start to zero, it's causing the function to access a
> different area.

Looks like we just need to set the offset used for 0 to 
__per_cpu_start during early boot.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/