Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] x86: add sysfs interface for cpuid module

[Yi Yang]

On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:44 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > +
> > +static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata cpuid_sysfs_cpu_notifier = {
> > +	.notifier_call = cpuid_sysfs_cpu_callback,
> > +};
> Data is annotated _cpuintidata
> 
> but
> 
> > +
> Data is annotated _cpuintidata
> 
> > @@ -217,11 +445,14 @@ static void __exit cpuid_exit(void)
> >  {
> >  	int cpu = 0;
> >  
> > -	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> > +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> >  		cpuid_device_destroy(cpu);
> > +		remove_cpuid_sysfs(cpu);
> > +	}
> >  	class_destroy(cpuid_class);
> >  	unregister_chrdev(CPUID_MAJOR, "cpu/cpuid");
> >  	unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&cpuid_class_cpu_notifier);
> > +	unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&cpuid_sysfs_cpu_notifier);
> 
> used in an __exit function.
> 
> You should have seen a Section mismatch warning for this.
> The right fix is to annotate the cpuid_sysfs_cpu_notifier
> with __initdata_refok (soon to be named __refdata)
> Or even better to declare it const and use _refconst.
I think __cpuinitdata is different from __initdata, i have tested it
by insmod, rmmod, echo 0/1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
repeatly, it hasn't any issue.

> 
> 	Sam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/