Re: [PATCH 02/22 -v7] Add basic support for gcc profiler instrumentation
From: Jan Kiszka
Date: Wed Jan 30 2008 - 08:26:12 EST
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> --- linux-mcount.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S 2008-01-29 16:59:15.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-mcount.git/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S 2008-01-29 17:26:18.000000000 -0500
> @@ -75,6 +75,31 @@ DF_MASK = 0x00000400
> NT_MASK = 0x00004000
> VM_MASK = 0x00020000
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MCOUNT
> +.globl mcount
> +mcount:
> + /* unlikely(mcount_enabled) */
> + cmpl $0, mcount_enabled
> + jnz trace
> + ret
(and the corresponding 64-bit version)
Is the impact of this change on the (already expensive) mcount_enabled
case negligible? I worried about use cases where we want to gain some
(relative) worst-case numbers via these instrumentations.
In my personal priority scheme, CONFIG_MCOUNT=y && !mcount_enabled comes
after mcount_enabled.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/