Re: [patch 1/6] mmu_notifier: Core code

[Robin Holt]

On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:19:28AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Jack Steiner wrote:
> 
> > Moving to a different lock solves the problem.
> 
> Well it gets us back to the issue why we removed the lock. As Robin said 
> before: If its global then we can have a huge number of tasks contending 
> for the lock on startup of a process with a large number of ranks. The 
> reason to go to mmap_sem was that it was placed in the mm_struct and so we 
> would just have a couple of contentions per mm_struct.
> 
> I'll be looking for some other way to do this.

I think Andrea's original concept of the lock in the mmu_notifier_head
structure was the best.  I agree with him that it should be a spinlock
instead of the rw_lock.

Thanks,
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/