Re: about relocs.c on x86

From: Chris Snook
Date: Thu Jan 31 2008 - 04:18:37 EST


Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 12:33 AM, Chris Snook <csnook@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yinghai Lu wrote:
why not rename relocs.c to relocs_32.c?
Because we're trying to get rid of all the _32 and _64 files?

but that file is not need for x86_64

Which means there's no conflict with any 64-bit code, and thus no reason to break it out into a _32 file.

-- Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/