Re: [patch 01/26] mount options: add documentation
From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Thu Jan 31 2008 - 12:43:37 EST
> > > - loop: how is the connection between file and loop device maintained?
> >
> > We also discussed this with Karel, maybe it didn't make it onto lkml.
> >
> > The proposed solution was to store the "loop" flag separately in a
> > file under /var. It could just be an empty file for each such loop
> > device:
> >
> > /var/lib/mount/loops/loop0
> >
> > This file is created by mount(8) if the '-oloop' option is given. And
> > umount(8) automatically tears down the loop device if it finds this
> > file.
>
> It seems we needn't this solution. There is loop auto-destruction
> patch in -mm.
>
> Kernel part:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119361296818388&w=2
>
> mount(8) part:
> http://marc.info/?l=util-linux-ng&m=119362955431694&w=2
>
> So, with this patch mount(8) needn't to maintain info about loops and
> umount(8) doesn't need to call LOOP_CLR_FD ioctl, because umount(2)
> is enough.
Excellent! This is a very good example how moving a functionality
into the kernel can greatly simplify it.
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/