Re: There are smaller ways to encode a CRC32 table...
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Fri Feb 01 2008 - 00:04:42 EST
George Spelvin wrote:
The code to fill it in is smaller than the table itself.
Is it worth complicating things with some INIT code to reduce
the stored image size? (The table is not compressible.)
I think it matters not at all either way.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/