Re: missing asm-x86_64 detection
From: Nish Aravamudan
Date: Fri Feb 01 2008 - 00:29:49 EST
On 1/31/08, Reinaldo Carvalho <reinaldow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> :/# uname -a
> Linux devil 2.6.22.16-amd64 #15 SMP Sat Jan 19 13:58:02 BRT 2008
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> :/# cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.22
> :/# patch -p1 -R < ../patch-2.6.22.16
> :/# patch -p1 < ../patch-2.6.23
> :/# patch -p1 < ../patch-2.6.24
> :/# cd /usr/src/ ; mv linux-2.6.22 linux-2.6.24; cd linux-2.6.24
> :/usr/src/linux-2.6.24# make oldconfig
> :/usr/src/linux-2.6.24# make all
> CHK include/linux/version.h
> CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
> ERROR: the symlink include/asm points to asm-x86_64 but asm-x86 was expected
> set ARCH or save .config and run 'make mrproper' to fix it
> make: ** [include/asm] Erro 1
>
> :/usr/src/linux-2.6.24# cp .config ../config-2.6.24
> :/usr/src/linux-2.6.24# make mrproper
> CLEAN scripts/basic
> CLEAN scripts/genksyms
> CLEAN scripts/kconfig
> CLEAN scripts/mod
> CLEAN scripts
> CLEAN include/config
> CLEAN .config .config.old include/asm .version
> include/linux/autoconf.h include/linux/version.h
> include/linux/utsrelease.h Module.symvers
> devil:/usr/src/linux-2.6.24# cp ../config-2.6.24 .config
> devil:/usr/src/linux-2.6.24# make oldconfig
> devil:/usr/src/linux-2.6.24# make all
> scripts/kconfig/conf -s arch/x86/Kconfig
> CHK include/linux/version.h
> UPD include/linux/version.h
> CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
> UPD include/linux/utsrelease.h
> SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86
> CC arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s
> GEN include/asm-x86/asm-offsets.h
> ...
>
> system is x86_64!
And your point? The archs are being merged into just x86 (instead of
x86_32 and x86_64 being separate). That's why the asm-x86_64 symlink
was complained about above.
There is no error. Check your config that CONFIG_64BIT and
CONFIG_X86_64 are set.
Thanks,
Nish
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/