Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git3: Major annoyance during suspend/hibernation on x86-64 (bisected)

[Dmitry Adamushko]

On 01/02/2008, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> thanks - i cannot reproduce it on my usual suspend/resume testbox
> because e1000 broke on it, and this is a pretty annoying regression.
> We'll have to undo the hung-tasks detection feature if it's not fixed
> quickly. (there's no point in debugging features that _add_ bugs)

I can reproduce it and Peter's patch does fix it for me.

e.g.
root@earth:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1# time echo 0 > online
real    0m6.743s
root@earth:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1# time echo 0 > online
real    0m7.770s

I've observed delays from ~3 s. up to ~8 s. (out of ~20 tests) so the
10s. delay of msleep_interruptible() might be related but
I'm still looking for the reason why this fix helps (and what goes
wrong with the current code).


>
>         Ingo
>

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/