Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test

[Ingo Molnar]

* David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > Plus, the way you're doing it now is violating the locking 
> > > protocol used by that driver.
> > 
> > Yep, you are right, but that is the easy issue to fix.
> 
> Which is why I was puzzled that you didn't start out doing it the 
> "right" way ... even just hard-wiring the dubious assumption that 
> "rtc0" is the right RTC to use.  :)

because this was mostly about an quick & easy hack to see whether it 
makes sense at all to automate the testing of suspend/resume. (People 
who want to use RTC functionality might not have the desire to get into 
extending it straight away - they just want something rather obvious 
done and that's it.)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/