Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability issues

[Arjan van de Ven]

David Chinner wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> When Matthew was describing this work at an LCA presentation (not
> sure whether you were at that presentation or not), Zach came up
> with the idea that allowing the submitting application control the
> CPU that the io completion processing was occurring would be a good
> approach to try.  That is, we submit a "completion cookie" with the
> bio that indicates where we want completion to run, rather than
> dictating that completion runs on the submission CPU.
>
> The reasoning is that only the higher level context really knows
> what is optimal, and that changes from application to application.

well.. kinda. One of the really hard parts of the submit/completion stuff is that
the slab/slob/slub/slib allocator ends up basically "cycling" memory through the system;
there's a sink of free memory on all the submission cpus and a source of free memory
on the completion cpu. I don't think applications are capable of working out what is
best in this scenario..


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/