Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add __asm__ to function-space-paren exception list

From: Andy Whitcroft
Date: Mon Feb 04 2008 - 06:21:45 EST


On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:17:28PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> checkpatch.pl thinks that __asm__ is a function name, so it complains about
> a space between the function name and a parenthesis when it sees
> "__asm__ ("mov ax,bx")".
>
> This change will also encourage developers to use '__asm__' instead of 'asm'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 579f50f..971c822 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ sub process {
>
> # check for spaces between functions and their parentheses.
> while ($line =~ /($Ident)\s+\(/g) {
> - if ($1 !~ /^(?:if|for|while|switch|return|volatile|__volatile__|__attribute__|format|__extension__|Copyright|case)$/ &&
> + if ($1 !~ /^(?:if|for|while|switch|return|volatile|__volatile__|__attribute__|format|__extension__|Copyright|case|__asm__)$/ &&
> $line !~ /$Type\s+\(/ && $line !~ /^.\#\s*define\b/) {
> WARN("no space between function name and open parenthesis '('\n" . $herecurr);
> }
> --

It truly is not clear what "type" of thing an __asm__ is these days.
Cirtainly it seems we can use it as an attribute of a type:

register unsigned long __r16 __asm__("$16") = rtc_access->function;

and yet also in its more traditional form:

__asm__(" call foo");

The latter form feels like a function? But cirtainly in the examples it
is shown with a space some of the time, and not others. Is __asm__ an
attribute of the null function (;) in this context or ... well ?

This patch really just removes any checks for spacing on __asm__ do we
have a preferred style for these? Attributes do seem to have spaces,
though in their most attribute like usage the __asm__ "attribute" does
not seem to be used with a space, so far anyhow.

Oh and why are we preferring the use of __asm__ over asm? They both
seem valid. Should we be recommending one over the other?

-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/