Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux

[Alan Cox]

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:36:19 -0500
"Lee Revell" <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Jan 30, 2008 1:54 PM, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > IANAL, and I would therefore ask a lawyer whether, and if yes under
> > which circumstances, shipping a binary driver written for another OS
> > dynamically linked into the Linux kernel would not be a criminal offense.
> >
> 
> Please stop throwing around words like "criminal".  If this is in fact
> illegal it would be a civil matter.

Actually in large parts of europe multiple repeated infractions of
copyright law are criminal matters.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/