RE: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24

[Pallipadi, Venkatesh]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Morton
>Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 4:33 PM
>To: Toralf Förster
>Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; cpufreq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 
>and 2.6.24
>
>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:06:25 +0100 Toralf Förster 
><toralf.foerster@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I use a 1-liner for a simple performance check : "time 
>factor 819734028463158891"
>> Here is the result for the new (Gentoo) kernel 2.6.24:
>> 
>> With the  ondemand governor of the  I get:
>> 
>> tfoerste@n22 ~/tmp $ time factor 819734028463158891
>> 819734028463158891: 3 273244676154386297
>> 
>> real    0m32.997s
>> user    0m15.732s
>> sys     0m0.014s
>> 
>> With the ondemand governor the CPU runs at 600 MHz,
>> whereas with the performance governor I get :
>> 
>> tfoerste@n22 ~/tmp $ time factor 819734028463158891
>> 819734028463158891: 3 273244676154386297
>> 
>> real    0m10.893s
>> user    0m5.444s
>> sys     0m0.000s
>> 
>> (~5.5 sec as I expected) b/c the CPU is set to 1.7 GHz.
>> 
>> The ondeman governor of previous kernel versions however 
>automatically increased
>> the CPU speed from 600 MHz to 1.7 GHz.
>> 
>> My system is a ThinkPad T41, I'll attach the .config 
>> 
>

This looks like is related to the report here
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0801.3/1260.html

Can you try the workarounds on that thread and see whether the problem goes away.

Thanks,
Venki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/