Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel

[Matt Mackall]

On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 16:24 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > 
> > But ATAoE is boring because it's not IP. Which means no routing,
> > firewalls, tunnels, congestion control, etc.
> 
> The thing is, that's often an advantage. Not just for performance.
> 
> > NBD and iSCSI (for all its hideous growths) can take advantage of these
> > things.
> 
> .. and all this could equally well be done by a simple bridging protocol 
> (completely independently of any AoE code).
> 
> The thing is, iSCSI does things at the wrong level. It *forces* people to 
> use the complex protocols, when it's a known that a lot of people don't 
> want it. 

I frankly think NBD is at a pretty comfortable level. It's internally
very simple (and hardware-agnostic). And moderately easy to do in
silicon.

But I'm not going to defend iSCSI. I worked on the first implementation
(what became the Cisco iSCSI driver) and I have no love for iSCSI at
all. It should have been (and started out as) a nearly trivial
encapsulation of SCSI over TCP much like ATA over Ethernet but quickly
lost the plot when committees got ahold of it.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/