Re: [2.6 patch] remove smbfs

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:31:14 -0500 Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > It looks like it's time?  If so, what should I set the date to?
> 
> Looks good to me. I'd suggest that we change the printk's to refer to a
> release version and state that it will be removed in for 2.6.26 (or
> 2.6.27 if that's not enough notice). Then, once the previous version is
> released, remove it from the tree as soon as possible.

OK.  smbfs is not exactly hurting us being there so I made it "will be
removed from the 2.6.27 kernel".  That gives the public the full
2.6.25->2.6.26 time period in which to discover what we're proposing and to
make any objections.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/