Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only

[Chris Friesen]

Marcel Holtmann wrote:

> If the developers say that this symbol can only be used in GPL code (and
> with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL it is quite clear) then you have to obey to that
> license or don't use this symbol at all.
>
> If you use that symbol inside non-GPL (meaning you link at runtime) then
> you are in violation of the GPL license. We can't make it much clearer.

Not necessarily so.  The developers feel that any code using that symbol 
is necessarily a derivative work, but at the end of the day it would be 
up to the legal system to decide whether it really is or not.

If the courts decided that the symbol could be used and the driver 
wouldn't be a derivative work, it would be perfectly legal to use a 
GPL'd shim to "re-export" the symbol, essentially stripping off the 
GPL-only protection for that symbol.

In our group all kernel modules that we write are GPL'd, as it lets us 
sleep at night, simplifies our lives, and makes the lawyers much 
happier.  Other people may be willing to take more risks.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/